USPTO serial 76680833
FRESH FROM THE KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRESH FROM THE KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean S. Wooden
Robert B. Famiglio Sean S. Wooden, Andrews Kurth LLP, c/o Kristy Neal1717 Main StreetSuite 3700Dallas, TX 75201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fresh and frozen pre-packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish and poultry; fresh and frozen food products, namely, cheese, meat and poultry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EPE Meals, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EPE Meals, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PERRY, PHILIP R.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named FRESH FROM THE KITCHEN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |