USPTO serial 76680881
REIGN SHOWERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REIGN SHOWERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Farrington, Robyn J.
- Other trademarks owned by Farrington, Robyn J.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named REIGN SHOWERS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |