USPTO serial 76681180
OBSIDIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAI, TINA HSIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OBSIDIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Montgomery G. Frankel
1304 OAK AVESAINT HELENA, CA 94574-1943UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | WINE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |