USPTO serial 76681371
MARBLE ZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3838182Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 24, 2010
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MARBLE ZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard O. Bartz
RICHARD O. BARTZ BARTZ & BARTZ6950 FRANCE AVE S STE 119EDINA, MN 55435-2024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | BUILDING MATERIALS, NOT OF METAL, NAMELY, QUARRY STONES FOR SLATES, SLABS, FLOORS, WALLS, COLUMNS, FIREPLACES, TILES, COUNTER TOPS, SILLS, SINKS, TUBS, DESK TOPS AND SIDEWALKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 26, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2009 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |