USPTO serial 76681519
CLAUSTROGLOBIA!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLAUSTROGLOBIA!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hillsborough, CA
Hillsborough, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, panties, shorts, briefs, sport coats, sport shirts, swimwear for ladies and gentlemen, sport jackets, footwear, headgear, namely, hats and caps, jackets, pants, shoes, T shirts | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2011 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |