USPTO serial 76681520
SLEEPSATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLEEPSATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Donald Weber, Jr.
G. DONALD WEBER, JR. LAW OFFICES OF G. DOLAND WEBER, JR.18442 TAFT AVEVILLA PARK, CA 92861UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | FUTON MATTRESSES; DAY BEDS; PLATFORM BEDS; PORTABLE MATTRESSES; MATTRESS FOR BEDROOM WITH OR WITHOUT INNERSPRINGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |