USPTO serial 76681932
BEAUTY DIALOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3651551Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 7, 2009
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEAUTY DIALOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hollywood, FL
Hollywood, FL
Hollywood, FL
FORT LAUDERDALE, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT M. DOWNEY
ROBERT M. DOWNEY ROBERT M. DOWNEY, P.A.6751 N FEDERAL HWY STE 300BOCA RATON, FL 33487-1647UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric hair curlers, electric curling irons, electric straightening irons, electric flat irons, electrically heated hair brushes, and hand-held electric hair dryers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Beauty Dialog Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Beauty Dialog Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Beauty Dialog Co.
- Other trademarks owned by DENG, SHIYU
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BEAUTY DIALOG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |