USPTO serial 76681948
VISIONARM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISIONARM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lloyd L. Rich
LLOYD L. RICH LAW OFFICE OF LLOYD L. RICH, PC1163 VINE STDENVER, CO 80206-2906UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LABORATORY ROBOTS, NAMELY, A ROBOTIC ARM EQUIPPED WITH VIDEO CAMERA TO PERFORM TASKS VIA REMOTE CONTROL, AUTONOMOUSLY AND SEMI-AUTONOMOUSLY; AND ROBOTS FOR PERSONAL OR HOBBY USE, NAMELY, A ROBOTIC ARM EQUIPPED WITH VIDEO CAMERA TO PERFORM TASKS VIA REMOTE CONTROL, AUTONOMOUSLY AND SEMI-AUTONOMOUSLY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |