USPTO serial 76682205
INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FENNESSY, EDWARD JOHN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John S. Hale
JOHN S. HALE GIPPLE & HALE6665A OLD DOMINION DRMC LEAN, VA 22101-4508UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of competitions in the field of athletics, namely, cricket sporting games; Organizing exhibitions for sporting purposes, namely, cricket sporting games; Arranging and conducting athletic competitions, namely, in the sport of cricket games; Production of radio and television programs featuring live cricket competitions and cricket exhibitions; and Educational services, namely, conducting classes and workshops and dissemination of information in the field of cricket sporting games, skills, instruction and related topics thereto and fan clubs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |