USPTO serial 76682275
ECOPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas R. Wolf
DOUGLAS R. WOLF WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS P.C.600 ATLANTIC AVENUEBOSTON, MA 02210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software discs and associated apparatus for enabling the scanning and electronic distribution of documents over computer networks and touch screen control panels for interfacing with such software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2011 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2010 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |