Drawing for DESIGN EXPRESSIONS

USPTO serial 76682478

DESIGN EXPRESSIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DESIGN EXPRESSIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Amer

Myron Amer Myron Amer, P.C.350 National BlvdSuite 2BLong Beach, NY 11561-3327

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035REFERRAL TO BUILDING CONTRACTORS NEEDING BUILDING MATERIALS OR SOURCES OF SUPPLY OF BUILDING MATERIALSACTIVEJun 18, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 4, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 4, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 21, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 21, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 12, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 22, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 23, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2008IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 28, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 9, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance