Drawing for DR.WU

USPTO serial 76682620

DR.WU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DR.WU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joe McKinney Muncy

Joe McKinney Muncy MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, PLLCP.O. Box 1364Fairfax, VA 22038-1364UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes; non-medicated skin care preparations; cosmetics, namely, creams, milks, lotions, gels and powders for the face, the body and the hands; non-medicated sun care preparations; make-up preparations; shampoos; gels, sprays, mousses and balms for hair styling and hair care; hair lacquers; hair colouring and hair decolorant preparations; permanent waving and curling preparations; non-medicated toilet preparations, namely, body wash, shower gel, skin moisturizers; toilet water; gels and salts for the bath and the shower; toilet soaps; soaps; body deodorants; essential oils for personal use; nail polishing preparations, namely, nail polish, nail polish base coat, nail polish top coat, nail polish removerACTIVEAug 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 8, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 8, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 17, 2010EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 2, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 2, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 2, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 2, 2009GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2009GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 20, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 20, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 28, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 14, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 17, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 15, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance