USPTO serial 76682756
SIMJAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMJAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Antonio, TX
San Antonio, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel D. Chapman
DANIEL D. CHAPMAN Jackson Walker L.L.P.112 E PECAN ST STE 2400SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205-1510UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Digital media ordering from a cell phone, namely, transmission of data, images, and messages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 5, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |