USPTO serial 76683202
WINNETOU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3744978Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 2, 2010
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WINNETOU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HAMILTON HM LX, BM
HAMILTON HM LX, BM
HAMILTON HM LX, BM
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned cooked meat, namely, luncheon meat, corned beef, and small spicy or non spicy sausages; poultry; frozen meats; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked canned vegetables; preserved, dried and cooked canned fruits, including, cranberries, blueberries and other fruits; canned and prepared frozen fish, namely, tuna, mackerel, sardines, herring, salmon; canned seafood, namely, shrimp, oysters, mussels, crab, lobster; soups, namely, chicken noodle soup, canned soups, dried soups and soup mixes; jams; jellies; marmalades; dairy derived products, namely, processed cheese and butter; sour cream; whipping cream; yogurt; milk products, namely, milk, condensed milk and evaporated milk; milk based drinks, namely, flavored milk; peanut butter; coconut cream and coconut milk used specifically as an ingredient in food items; edible oils and fats, namely, olive oil, canola oil; pastes, namely, fruit pastes, vegetables pastes, meat pastes, tomato paste and hot pepper paste; processed pulses, namely, lentils, peas, beans pickles; fruit sauces, namely, cranberry sauce, apple sauce; canned corn, namely, whole kernel corn and corn on the cob; potato crisps and potato chips; nut meats; frozen, prepared and packaged ready to eat meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry and/or vegetables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 27, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TERFLOTH TRADE MARKS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TERFLOTH TRADE MARKS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by TERFLOTH TRADE MARKS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named WINNETOU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |