USPTO serial 76683268
DANCE HERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DANCE HERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas B. Haverstock
THOMAS B HAVERSTOCK HAVERSTOCK & OWENS LLP162 NORTH WOLFE ROADSUNNYVALE, CA 94086-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS, VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES, GAME CONTROLLERS FOR COMPUTER GAMES, INTERACTIVE TOOLS AND OTHER GAME ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, WIRELESS TRANSMITTERS, WIRELESS RADIATION RECEIVERS AND REFLECTORS, AND SIGNAL PROCESSORS; PRE-RECORDED CD-ROMS, AND OTHER COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM FEATURING VIDEO GAMES, ALL FOR USE WITH PERSONAL VIDEO GAME CONSOLES, COMPUTERS AND ARCADE MACHINES; PRINTED MATTER ABOUT THE GOODS IN THE NATURE OF LITERATURE AND INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS SOLD THEREWITH; AND DOWNLOADABLE VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |