USPTO serial 76683331
EAGLE-300
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EAGLE-300?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William D. Breneman
William D. Breneman BRENEMAN & GEORGES3150 COMMONWEALTH AVEALEXANDRIA, VA 22305-2712UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical surveillance equipment and systems, namely, scanners, namely, optical scanners and visual and infrared sensors, computer central processing units and control graphic user interface software and computer hardware and software, all for security tracking of people and objects for tethered and untethered free flying robotic aircraft to provide a 360-degree surveillance and security tracking of people and objects and the security tracking of moving objects and people; optical surveillance equipment and systems, namely, computers for managing control devices for tethered and untethered free flying robotic aircraft to provide a 360-degree security surveillance and security tracking of people and objects and for the security tracking of moving objects and people | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 30, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |