Drawing for REIGN OPULENCE

USPTO serial 76683512

REIGN OPULENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REIGN OPULENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Cox

WILLIAM H. COX Janvey, Gordon, Herlands, Randolph355 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-6603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded audio and video tapes, compact discs, DVDs and sound recordings all featuring musical performances; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely, tape recorders and tape players, compact disc players, MP3 players, radios, DVD players and video tape players and video tape recorders; eyeglass frames, sunglass frames, ophthalmic prescription eyeglass framesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 26, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 13, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 11, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 11, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 9, 2010NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Dec 8, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2010DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 6, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 18, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 18, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 30, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 10, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 3, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 31, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 22, 2008CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 21, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 30, 2008DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jun 30, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 27, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2008IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2008INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jun 11, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 9, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2007MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 6, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance