USPTO serial 76683514
ECON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HABEEB, MYRIAH A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward P. Kelly
EDWARD P. KELLY Tiajoloff & Kelly405 Lexington AvenueChrysler Building, 37th FloorNew York, NY 10174Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal filters of plastic processing machines; perforated metal plates of plastic processing machines; perforated metal plates of plastic processing machines of special wear resistance, especially for underwater granulation | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Machine parts, namely, expendable metal parts for plastics processing machines in trade and industry; knife granulators; vibrating screens made of metal used in plastics processing machines; plastics processing equipment, namely, extruders used in plastic processing, devices for underwater granulation of plastic materials, devices for continuous filtration in plastics processing units, especially single-plunger screen changers, double-plunger screen changers, leakage-free screen changers, back-flushing devices for screen changers; venting devices for screen changers; grinding devices for knife granulators; centrifugal dryers; vibrating dryers; sizing screens; pumps; electrically driven cleaning devices, especially for cleaning metal tools and filters soiled by plastic residues | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Thermostatting devices for plastic melts and liquids | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 011 | Industrial dryers for heating and dehumidifying, namely, centrifugal dryers and vibrating dryers; water conditioning equipment, namely, water conditioning units | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 037 | Installation of machines and control facilities used in plastics processing, repair work on machines and control facilities for plastics processing; installation and repair of pyrolitic ovens | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ECON Maschinenbau und Steurungstechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named ECON
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |