USPTO serial 76683621
ETOOTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOONE, JOHN C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ETOOTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ezra Sutton
EZRA SUTTON Ezra Sutton, P. A.Plaza 9, 900 Route 9Woodbridge, NJ 07095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | HEADSETS FOR TELEPHONES; HEADSETS FOR USE WITH COMPUTERS; HEADPHONES, AUDIO SPEAKERS, TRANSMITTERS FOR TRANSMITTING DATA TO PRINTERS, CELLULAR TELEPHONES, AND MUSICAL DEVICES; ADAPTERS FOR TELEPHONE PRODUCTS AND MUSIC PLAYERS; DONGLES, NAMELY, AN ADAPTER THAT TRANSMITS ELECTRONIC DATA OR AUDIO DATA TO A RECEIVER OF AUDIO, ELECTRONIC OR RELATED DATA, COMPUTER MOUSES, KEYBOARDS, TELEPHONES, CELL PHONES AND PRINTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 13, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 12, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |