USPTO serial 76683900
THE HAIR PLACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE HAIR PLACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BURTONSVILLE, MD
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | TO PROVIDE BEAUTY SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2009 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |