USPTO serial 76683954
SASHAY PERSONAL SALON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SASHAY PERSONAL SALON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlingame, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | SKIN LOTIONS, SKIN CLARIFIERS, SKIN CLEANSERS, SKIN MOISTURIZER, SKIN CONDITIONERS, SKIN CREAMS, MAKEUP, LIPSTICK, NAIL POLISH, EYE SHADOW AND LIP GLOSS | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2010 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |