USPTO serial 76684016
GLOBAL FILTRATION PARTNERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOBAL FILTRATION PARTNERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Curcio
ROBERT CURCIO DeLio & Peterson, LLC121 WHITNEY AVENEW HAVEN, CT 06510-1242UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | FIBER PULP PREPARATIONS IN THE NATURE OF FILTERING MATERIALS FOR THE MANUFACTURING OF CONSUMER AIR AND WATER FILTERS, AND FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF COMMERCIAL AND FOOD SERVICE ACTIVATED CARBON FILTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | WATER AND AIR FILTERS FOR DOMESTIC, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE; AIR FILTERS FOR AIR CONDITIONING UNITS; FILTERS FOR COOLANT RECOVERY SYSTEMS; FILTERS FOR DRIPPER IRRIGATION SYSTEMS; WATER FILTERING UNITS FOR PRODUCING POTABLE WATER FOR DOMESTIC USE; COMPONENTS OF WATER FILTRATION UNITS FOR PRODUCING POTABLE WATER FOR DOMESTIC USE, NAMELY, ACTIVATED CARBON WATER FILTERS; FILTERS FOR AIR CONDITIONING UNITS; FILTERS FOR USE IN SWIMMING POOLS OR HOT TUBS; FILTERS FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEMS; FILTERS FOR LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEMS; FILTERS FOR RECOVERY SYSTEMS; FILTER SYSTEMS PRIMARILY COMPRISED OF WATER FILTERING UNITS, AIR FILTERING UNITS, AND FILTERS FOR DRINKING WATER; FILTER MEDIA FOR GENERAL COMMERCIAL USE IN THE PURIFICATION OF AIR AND DRINKING WATER, AND FOR THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL USE IN THE PURIFICATION OF AIR AND INDUSTRIAL FLUIDS; AIR AND WATER FILTER SYSTEM COMPONENTS FOR DOMESTIC, INDUSTRIAL, AND COMMERCIAL USE, NAMELY, FILTER HOUSINGS; FILTERS MADE OF FIBER FOR WATER FILTRATION, NAMELY, CARBON FIBER, CELLULOSE-BASED FIBER; WATER FILTERS FOR DOMESTIC, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL USE; FILTERS FOR WATER PURIFICATION APPARATUS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | NEWSLETTERS ON THE SUBJECT OF WATER FILTERS AND FILTRATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |