USPTO serial 76684095
LOLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Cislo
HARRY HARALAMBUS BEAUTY PARTNERS INC DBA LOLA9169 W SUNSET BLVDW HOLLYWOOD, CA 90069UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Brushes, namely, eye brushes, brow brushes, face brushes, blush brushes, concealer brushes, and lip brushes; sponges for applying make-up; and powder puffs for cosmetic purposes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |