USPTO serial 76684367
INTERTRAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERTRAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard C. Cooper
Jason L. Budd Price, Heneveld, Cooper, DeWitt695 Kenmoor SEP.O. Box 2567Grand Rapids, MI 49501Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automated resource accountability hardware for tracking field personnel and assets where ID tags are associated with first responders to the scene of an incident, victims, patients, volunteers, evacuees, emergency management personnel, equipment, and other assets and computer hardware and software read information from the ID tags, to manage the data on-scene and post data via the Internet so that remote facilities or agencies can monitor what is occurring at an incident, emergency, or field event the hardware, software, and ID tags not being used in a hospital setting, except in relation to an incident, emergency, or field event | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 21, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |