USPTO serial 76684514
Serial No. 76684514
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76684514?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mechanicsville, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward J. Kondracki
EDWARD J. KONDRACKI Miles & Stockbridge P.C.1751 PINNACLE DR STE 500MC LEAN, VA 22102-3833UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | sunglasses | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 9, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |