USPTO serial 76684575
BERNIE'S HOT DOG CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 31, 2009
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BERNIE'S HOT DOG CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Highlands Ranch, CO
Highlands Ranch, CO
Highlands Ranch, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry W. Rothman
MATTHEW D. MACY STEWART, SHORTRIDGE & FITZKE, P.C.4 INVERNESS COURT EAST, SUITE 100ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Fast Food Restaurant | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 15, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |