USPTO serial 76684651
CHOP STRAWS.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHOP STRAWS.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Chopstrraws are used for sipping and eating | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |