USPTO serial 76684732
NATUGRAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATUGRAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald J. Shore
Ronald J. Shore Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLP1300 17th Street, N.Suite 1800Arlington, VA 22209-3873Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Milled-grain-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; bruised-grain-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods; bran-based food to be used as a breakfast food, snack food or ingredient for making other foods | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |