USPTO serial 76684798
MAG-E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAG-E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Aurora, Ontario L4G7K1, CA
Aurora, Ontario L4G7K1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer M. Hetu
Jennifer M. Hetu Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | electric vehicles, namely, cars and trucks, and accessories, namely, electric drives, transmissions and drivetrains for electric cars and trucks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design for others in the field of engineering, namely, engineering electric vehicles and components and assemblies therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Magna International Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Magna International Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAG-E
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |