USPTO serial 76685018
KOSMIC STALLIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 4, 2011
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KOSMIC STALLIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BLOOMINGTON, MN
BLOOMINGTON, MN
BLOOMINGTON, MN
BLOOMINGTON, MN
BLOOMINGTON, MN
BLOOMINGTON, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. JOHN BARTZ
R. JOHN BARTZ BARTZ & BARTZ, P.A.6950 FRANCE AVE SOUTHSuite 119EDINA, MN 55435-2024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, hats, caps, t-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, jerseys, shirts, slacks, shorts, socks, athletic shoes, team jackets, rainwear, parkas, sweaters, scarves, pants, trousers, boots, gloves, mittens, pajamas, swimsuits, jackets, wind-resistant jackets, bras, compression shorts, sliding shorts and catcher sliding shorts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 18, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JAMES, ROBERT S.
- Other trademarks owned by JAMES, ROBERT S.
- Other trademarks owned by JAMES, ROBERT S.
- Other trademarks owned by OZASKY, ROBERT E.
- Other trademarks owned by OZASKY, ROBERT E.
- Other trademarks owned by OZASKY, ROBERT E.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named KOSMIC STALLIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 4, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 5, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2018 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |