USPTO serial 76685026
COMMUNITY TRUST BANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMMUNITY TRUST BANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Whitaker Rayner
W WHITAKER RAYNER JONES WALKER LLPPO BOX 427JACKSON, MS 39205-0427UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking services | ABANDONED | Oct 26, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Community Trust Bank
- Other trademarks owned by Community Trust Bank
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named COMMUNITY TRUST BANK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 22, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 22, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 22, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2014 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |