USPTO serial 76685039
NANO BLADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NANO BLADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Aichi, 442-0005, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yasuo Muramatsu
YASUO MURAMATSU Muramatsu & Associates114 PACIFICA STE 310IRVINE, CA 92618-3329UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated metalworking machine tools, namely, punch presses, shapers, sawing machines, grinding machines, perforators, cutting machines, lathes, slotting machines, boring machines, threading machines, tapping machines, gear cutting and finishing machines, milling machines, planers, honing machines, drilling machines, and lapping machines; power operated metal cutting tools, namely, gear cutters, taps, chasers, drills, thread milling cutters, single point tools in the nature of ball endmills, broaches, milling cutters, and reamers; power operated cemented carbide tools, namely, cemented carbide cutting tools, and cemented cutter tools in the nature of cutter tips; power operated diamond tools, namely, diamond-pointed cutting tools, and diamond-pointed cutting tools for wear-resistant applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |