USPTO serial 76685133
EURO-PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EURO-PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Sutton
JOSEPH SUTTON Law Offices of Ezra Sutton, P.A.900 U.S. Hwy. 9Plaza 9 Bldg.Woodbridge, NJ 07095Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Flatware, namely, forks, knives, and spoons; cutlery; and flatware and serving utensils sold as a set | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 31, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |