USPTO serial 76685153
AQUACLUSTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AQUACLUSTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Dean Domingue
C. DEAN DOMINGUE Perret Doise, APLCPO BOX 3408LAFAYETTE, LA 70502-3408UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | WEB-BASED SERVICE PROVIDING INDIVIDUALS A MECHANISM TO CREATE NEW COLLABORATIVE PROJECTS WITH GROUPS OF PEOPLE WORKING TOGETHER TO RESOLVE ISSUES, WRITE DOCUMENTATION AND DISCUSS TOPICS; WEB-BASED SERVICE INCLUDING THREE PRIMARY FEATURES NAMELY, (1) A PROJECT BASED ISSUE TRACKING SYSTEM ALLOWING USERS TO ENTER ISSUES INTO A DATABASE WHICH ARE VISIBLE AND SHARED AMONGST EACH MEMBER OF THE GROUP, (2) A PROJECT BASED WIKI DOCUMENTATION DATABASE ALLOWING USERS TO WRITE DOCUMENTATION COLLABORATIVELY BY ALLOWING USERS TO MODIFY DOCUMENTATION PAGES AND HAVE THE SERVICE MERGE MODIFICATIONS TO RESOLVE ANY CONFLICTS, AND (3) AN ELECTRONIC FORUM ALLOWING MEMBERS TO DISCUSS AND COMMUNICATE REGARDING VARIOUS TOPICS IN REGARDS TO THE PROJECT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |