USPTO serial 76685189
PAUL BOCUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PAUL BOCUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathaniel Kramer
Nathaniel Kramer Kirschstein Ottinger Israel Schiffmiller425 Fifth AvenueFifth FloorNew York, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Kitchenware, namely, pots, pans, saucepans, frying, griddle and stock pans; china plates, bowls, dishes, cups, and mugs; glass bowls, carafes, mugs, storage jars, dishes, fruit bowls, wine glasses, and drinking glasses; porcelain and earthenware plates, bowls, dishes, cups and mugs; bakeware, non-electric kettles and teapots, non-electric food blenders and whisks; serving utensils, namely, serving tongs, forks, ladles and spoons; salt and pepper shakers, corkscrews, chopping boards for kitchen use, coasters not of paper and other than table linen, napkin rings | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |