USPTO serial 76685286
HOW NOT TO DIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOW NOT TO DIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
350 National BlvdSuite 2BLong Beach, NY 11561-3327Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Television entertainment and education, namely, a continuing program about longevity accessible by television | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 20, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |