USPTO serial 76685298
PUREAIR 32
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3787708Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2010
- Examiner
- PILARO, MARK F
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PUREAIR 32?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
INDUSTRIAL SOLUTION SERVICES, INC.
UPLAND, CA
Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIAL SOLUTION SERVICES, INC.
INDUSTRIAL SOLUTION SERVICES, INC.
UPLAND, CA
Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIAL SOLUTION SERVICES, INC.
INDUSTRIAL SOLUTION SERVICES, INC.
UPLAND, CA
Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIAL SOLUTION SERVICES, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD G. ANDERSON
RICHARD G. ANDERSON RICHARD G. ANDERSON, INC.1365 W FOOTHILL BLVD STE 2UPLAND, CA 91786-3612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | reagent grade urea solution for treatment of diesel exhaust emissions/NOx control | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 20, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIAL SOLUTION SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIAL SOLUTION SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INDUSTRIAL SOLUTION SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named PUREAIR 32
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 11, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 28, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |