Drawing for CODEBLACK DIGITAL

USPTO serial 76685449

CODEBLACK DIGITAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CODEBLACK DIGITAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DeAnne Ozaki

DeAnne Ozaki Universal Music Group2220 Colorado AvenueSanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Mobile media services in the nature of electronic transmission of entertainment and information media content; wireless electronic transmission of entertainment and information media content; internet related services, namely, streaming of audio and video entertainment and information material via the internet; pay-per-view television transmission services; and video on-demand transmission servicesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2011MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Dec 13, 2011ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Dec 12, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Oct 22, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 21, 2011EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Oct 20, 2011EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Oct 20, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Apr 8, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 30, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 30, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 12, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Oct 8, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Oct 8, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 27, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED
Apr 24, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Apr 19, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Mar 26, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 26, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Oct 19, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 5, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 5, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 21, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 9, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Sep 3, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 15, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 14, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 14, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 12, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 12, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 8, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance