USPTO serial 76685841
ITOUCH COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ITOUCH COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul G. Novak
Paul G. Novak Dickstein Shapiro LLP2049 Century Park East, Suite 700Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | User manuals for installers and technicians of fiber-optic broadband telecommunications software; and product literature for broadband data telecommunications software, namely, informational papers and flyers, all pertaining to fiber-optic networking equipment, services and equipment management in the fiber-optic telecommunications industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 27, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |