Drawing for MPADVANTAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 76685931

MPADVANTAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MPADVANTAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip M. Weiss

PHILIP M. WEISS Weiss & Weiss300 OLD COUNTRY RD STE 251MINEOLA, NY 11501-4149UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Commercial and industrial food processing machines for applying breading, batters, seasoning and flour to food products and for aligning food products for further processing; commercial and industrial food mixing machines for mixing batters and brines; commercial and industrial food processing machines, namely, meat, chicken, fish and vegetable forming machines; frying systems comprised of industrial deep fryers; commercial and industrial food processing machines in the nature of cutting machines, namely, water cutters used to trim meat to different sizes, oil filters, reject conveyersACTIVE—
009Measuring machines, namely, machines that measure, weigh and determine temperature of meats during processing, for quality control purposesACTIVE—
011Industrial cooking ovensACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2011INCSITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE—
Feb 28, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 14, 2010EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2010EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 27, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 17, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 3, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2009INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Sep 28, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 4, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 3, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 4, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 30, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 30, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2008CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Apr 29, 2008CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Apr 28, 2008CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 28, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance