USPTO serial 76686632
PLAY NATURALLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLAY NATURALLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond Sun
RAYMOND SUN Law Offices of Raymond Sun12420 WOODHALL WAYTUSTIN, CA 92782-1165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer stylus; Children's educational software; DVD players; Electronic personal organizer; Mobile telephones; Personal digital assistants; Television monitors; Television sets; Touch pads; Touch panels; Computer touch screens; Trackballs and Computer mice; Cameras; Video game cartridges; Computer game cartridges; Computer game cassettes; Computer game discs; Computer game software; Electronic and video game controllers incorporated into exercise machines; Electronic game programs; Electronic game software for cellular telephones; Electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; Player-operated electronic controllers for electronic video game machines; Video game interactive hand held remote controls for playing electronic games | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Action skill games; Action target games; Arcade-type electronic education video games; Baby and children's multiple activity toys; Balls for games; Battery operated action toys; Board games; Card games; Construction toys; Dice games; Dolls and accessories therefore; Doll cases; Doll clothing; Doll costumes; Doll furniture; Doll house furnishings; Doll houses; Dolls and playsets therefor; Electric action toys; Electronic educational game machines for children; Electronic learning toys; Equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; Equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; Equipment sold as a unit for playing a memory game; Equipment sold as a unit for playing action type target games; Fantasy character toys; Hand held unit for playing electronic games; Hand held unit for playing video games; Headgear for dolls; Infant development toys; Infant toys; Jigsaw puzzles; Manipulative games; Mechanical toys; Model cars; Modeled plastic toy figurines; Molded toy figures; Play houses; Play tents; Play tunnels; Playsets for dolls; Plush toys; Porcelain dolls; Positionable toy figures for use in games and puzzles; Positionable two dimensional toys for use in games; Role playing games; Sport balls; Stand alone video game machines; Stationary exercise bicycles; Stuffed dolls, stuffed toys and stuffed toy animals; Tabletop units for playing electronic games other than in conjunction with a television or computer; Talking toys; Target games; Toy action figures and accessories thereof; Toy houses; Toy model cars; Toy vehicles; Trading card games; Play tents; sport game and play structures, namely, collapsible structures in the nature of play houses, play tents and play tunnels, that have one or more sporting or amusement items associated therewith; Play shelters in the nature of play houses, play tents and play tunnels; Doll houses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |