USPTO serial 76686633
STIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3753404Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 23, 2010
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, PAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
City of Industry, CA
City of Industry, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond Sun
RAYMOND SUN Law Offices of Raymond Sun12420 WOODHALL WAYTUSTIN, CA 92782-1165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video game interactive hand held remote controls for playing electronic games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |