USPTO serial 76686660
BROOKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2010
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with BROOKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
JENSEN ENTERPRISES, INC. DBA JENSEN PRECAST
SPARKS, NV
Other trademarks owned by JENSEN ENTERPRISES, INC. DBA JENSEN PRECAST
Anaheim, CA
Anaheim, CA
Anaheim, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory B. Phillips
Gregory B. Phillips Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP2040 Main Street, 14th Floor, 14th floorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CONCRETE VAULTS FOR USE WITH WATER METERS, WATER VALVES, GAS METERS, GAS VALVES, POWER EQUIPMENT, TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT, IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT, AND SEWERS, CONCRETE MANHOLES, CONCRETE SUPPORT PADS FOR POWER TRANSFORMERS, CONCRETE BOXES FOR USE AS IRRIGATION CONDUITS, CONCRETE SEWER CLEAN-OUT BOXES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JENSEN ENTERPRISES, INC. DBA JENSEN PRECAST
- Other trademarks owned by HEITMAN HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HEITMAN HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HEITMAN HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named BROOKS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 31, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2021 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 15, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2020 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 9, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 8, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 11, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |