USPTO serial 76687227
THE EVOLUTION OF SIGNAGE. A REVOLUTION IN SIMPLICITY.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURNS, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE EVOLUTION OF SIGNAGE. A REVOLUTION IN SIMPLICITY.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, Ontario, CA
London, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather A. Dunn
Heather A. Dunn DLA Piper LLP (US)555 Mission Street, Suite 2400San Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software designed to distribute, maintain, manage and display digital content for networked, standalone, internet, intranet and extranet applications, all for use in marketing and advertising products and businesses; and computer hardware and software designed to manage and analyze data found in a wide variety of corporate records and public resources for the purpose of targeted delivery of digital content for networked, standalone, internet, intranet and extranet applications, and for providing access to the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EK3 Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by EK3 Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named THE EVOLUTION OF SIGNAGE. A REVOLUTION IN SIMPLICITY.
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |