USPTO serial 76687280
BBW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BBW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
Myron Amer Myron Amer, P.C.350 National BlvdSuite 2BLong Beach, NY 11561-3327Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's knee high stockings of nylon and spandex construction material and not including upper torso clothing | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |