USPTO serial 76687372
GREEN PAWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GREEN PAWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Forest Hills, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
Myron Amer Myron Amer, P.C.350 National BlvdSuite 2BLong Beach, NY 11561-3327Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | chemical constituted cleaners for the removal from household rugs of stains caused by pets | ACTIVE | Aug 30, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2009 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |