USPTO serial 76687567
DEADLY BALLROOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HESIK, APRIL ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEADLY BALLROOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pacific Palisades, CA
Pacific Palisades, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel E. Siegel
JOEL E. SIEGEL WOOD, PHILLIPS, KATZ, CLARK & MORTIMER500 W. MADISON STREETCITIGROUP CENTER, SUITE 3800CHICAGO, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of a television series featuring dancing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |