USPTO serial 76687896
TECHXPERTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECHXPERTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel E. Siegel
JOEL E. SIEGEL Wood, Phillips, Katz, Clark & Mortimer500 W. Madison StreetCitigroup Center, Suite 3800Chicago, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing customers with information that identifies vendors that provide various computer related goods and services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |