USPTO serial 76688146
JITLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JITLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TOD R. NISSLE
TOD R. NISSLE TOD R. NISSLE, P.C.PO BOX 55630PHOENIX, AZ 85078-5630UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic funds transfer services; electronic commerce services, namely, credit card transaction processing services, credit card verification services, payment process services, and bill processing services; electronic commerce services, namely, gift registry services, providing an on-line customer-to-business marketplace where customers can buy and sell, providing on-line retail and business management; providing pay-per-click advertising routing; providing e-mail routing for email recipients, computer services, namely, monitoring, tracking and reporting on the performance of the website and on-line content of others; computer services in the nature of customer web pages featuring user defined information, personal profiles, and information; providing-on-line software for creating and maintaining web sites; providing on-line software featuring on-line storage of documents and databases; providing on-line software for tracking, managing, and optimizing advertising and promotional campaigns, providing on-line software for tracking website traffic, e-commerce activity, customer loyalty, and sales conversion rates; providing on-line software for managing, collecting, and monitoring and analyzing web and other on-line site traffic, user preferences and links in real time, dissemination of advertising for others viathe Internet; electronic mail services; financial transaction processing services, namely, clearing and reconciling financial transactions via a global computer network; electronic processing and transmission of payment data for users of a global communications network; electronic retailing services via a computer; computer services, namely, providing software interfaces available over a network in order to create personalized on-line information services; computer software for searching, compiling, indexing, and organizing information on computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |