USPTO serial 76688221
SMALL VINES VITICULTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMALL VINES VITICULTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF VINEYARD DEVELOPMENT, NAMELY, BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF PROVIDING START-UP SUPPORT FOR VINE YARD BUSINESS OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION; SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF VINES, VINEYARD DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION PROJECTS; NOTING THE BENEFITS THE USAGE OF SMALL VINES WITH RESPECT TO QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF GRAPES HARVESTED AND WINE PRODUCED; ASSIST THE PUBLIC WITH SELECTION OF AND INSTALLATION OF MANAGEMENT OF SMALL VINE VINEYARDS | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2001 |
| 044 | TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF VITICULTURE, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF VINEYARD HORTICULTURE; SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF VINES AND VINEYARD INSTALLATION PROJECTS, NAMELY, PROVIDING ADVISORY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF VINEYARD HORTICULTURE TO ASSIST OTHERS IN THE INSTALLATION OF VINES FOR VITICULTURE, VITICULTURE SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF GRAPE GROWING AND CULTIVATION OF GRAPES FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF VINEYARD HORTICULTURE, NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION TO ASSIST OTHERS WITH SELECTION OF AND INSTALLATION OF MANAGEMENT OF SMALL VINE VINEYARDS | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |